<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>299 Steps to Website Heaven &#187; No no no!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/category/no-no-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>from NikkiPilkington.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Fan Check Virus- is it a virus or a hoax?</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/09/08/facebook-fan-check-virus-is-it-a-virus-or-a-hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/09/08/facebook-fan-check-virus-is-it-a-virus-or-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re on facebook, then by now you&#8217;ve probably heard the hype about the Facebook Fan Check application, and the fact that it could contain a virus.
To find out more, I turned to one of my favourite sources of news, Mashable - who seem to be saying that it&#8217;s not so much the app itself [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re on facebook, then by now you&#8217;ve probably heard the hype about the Facebook Fan Check application, and the fact that it could contain a virus.</p>
<p>To find out more, I turned to one of my favourite sources of news, <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/09/07/facebook-fan-check-virus-hoax/" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">Mashable </a>- who seem to be saying that it&#8217;s not so much the app itself that has a virus, but the emails and sites claiming to be able to fix it. Confused yet?</p>
<p>All I know is that until I removed the app, de-fanned it and detagged myself from all photos I was in, my Facebook friends feed was back to normal. Prior to that it was only showing old updates, and people were in the wrong categories.</p>
<p>So, I would suggest that if your feed is going screwy, you:</p>
<ul>
<li>Block the Facebook Fan Check application &#8211; you should be able to find it by searching for &#8216;fan check&#8217; in the search box on your profile (or use this link <a href="http://www.facebook.com/fancheck?v=feed&amp;story_fbid=231758205581&amp;ref=mf" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/fancheck?v=feed&amp;story_fbid=231758205581&amp;ref=mf</a> )</li>
<li>Remove yourself from the page&#8217;s fans list</li>
<li>Visit any pictures that have tagged you and detag yourself</li>
<li>Log out of Facebook</li>
<li>Log back in</li>
</ul>
<p>This worked for us, and the handful of clients who have asked for our help.</p>
<p>So, does the Facebook Fan Check application contain a virus? I honestly don&#8217;t know &#8211; I can&#8217;t see that it would have been accepted by Facebook if it had, but I guess stranger things have happened. All I know is that it does seem to affect the feed of people using it (unless the timing is a massive coincidence!) and removing it fixes that problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll err on the safe side and stay away from it <img src='http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>UPDATE: It appears that people who have had nothing to do with Fan Check have had Facebook feed problems too, so the plot thickens &#8211; I&#8217;m keeping it blocked though <img src='http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>UPDATE 2: Here&#8217;s Snopes&#8217; take on it: <a href="http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2009/09/14/about-that-alleged-fan-check-application-virus-on-facebook.htm" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2009/09/14/about-that-alleged-fan-check-application-virus-on-facebook.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/09/08/facebook-fan-check-virus-is-it-a-virus-or-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Google no longer uses title tags&#8221; and other blatant untruths&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/16/google-no-longer-uses-title-tags-and-other-blatant-untruths/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/16/google-no-longer-uses-title-tags-and-other-blatant-untruths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titles & Tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scumbags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like to think I&#8217;m a fair person. I don&#8217;t believe in slagging off my competition, and always try to be even handed if someone asks for my advice on work done by someone else.
But every so often someone sends me something that makes my blood boil. Well yesterday I had 2 emails from 2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-446" title="burglar" src="http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/burglar.jpg" alt="burglar" width="137" height="165" />I like to think I&#8217;m a fair person. I don&#8217;t believe in slagging off my competition, and always try to be even handed if someone asks for my advice on work done by someone else.</p>
<p>But every so often someone sends me something that makes my blood boil. Well yesterday I had 2 emails from 2 separate people, who I&#8217;d given some advice to on public forums.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t name them here, but I will cover the downright lies they&#8217;ve been told, and the bad service they&#8217;ve received from their SEO consultants.</p>
<p>To clarify: SEO Consultant 1 is a web designer specialising in SEO &amp; Social media, SEO Consultant 2 is a company using dubious telesales tactics and mentioned in several places elsewhere for ripping customers off.</p>
<p><strong>SEO Consultant 1</strong> told his client that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Google no longer uses title tags</li>
<li>The META description isn&#8217;t important</li>
<li>Link exchange is the way to good listings</li>
<li>No-one searches for your search phrase anyway</li>
</ul>
<p>This was blatantly to cover up the fact that he&#8217;d done no work on the site and achieved nothing.</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s put those lies to bed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Google DOES use the title tag &#8211; in fact it&#8217;s one of the most important parts of onsite SEO. Granted, it&#8217;s not the be all and end all of SEO, but it is a major part, and without it, you may as well not bother. If every page of your website simply has your company name as it&#8217;s title tag, then you&#8217;re not going to be found for anything else. And don&#8217;t get me started on the dreaded &#8220;Home Page&#8221; title tag. The simple fact was, the SEO had done no title tag work and was claiming that they&#8217;re not used any more by Google in order to dupe his client. That&#8217;s wrong.</li>
<li>The META description IS important &#8211; it&#8217;s the description that Google shows when your site shows up in the results, and can be the difference between someone clicking on your listing or not. Of course, if you don&#8217;t have any listings anyway because your SEO hasn&#8217;t done the work they&#8217;re supposed to, then I guess the description tag doesn&#8217;t really matter after all&#8230;</li>
<li>Link exchange CAN be a good way to help your listings if everything else is in place, but the link exchange page that this client was given was a FFA (Free For All) links page where anyone could sign up and no checks were made. This meant that the site could be linking to unrelated sites, and there was no check in place to ensure that reciprocal links were given. I&#8217;m not a big fan of reciprocal links, and it&#8217;s been proven that one way links from well respected sites work far better to enhance your SEO, so although this cold be said to help, I think the client was misled.</li>
<li>&#8220;No-one searches for your search phrase anyway&#8221; &#8211; well, I&#8217;m sorry, but this makes me REALLY angry! In the first instance, why wasn&#8217;t proper keyword research done to find out whether the phrase chosen was a) suitable, b) achievable and c) worth optimising for in the first place. If hardly anyone is searching for it (which, as it happens, was a blatant lie &#8211; it&#8217;s one o the most competitive searches on the web), why on earth bother optimising for it in the first place?</li>
</ul>
<p>The client involved had paid for a year&#8217;s SEO up front and from what I could tell, received very little. The site had 9 backlinks showing in Google, of which 6 were internal links from the site itself, there was no Webmaster Tools account, and in 5 months there had been no reporting, no help and advice, no status checks &#8211; nothing.</p>
<p><strong>SEO Consultant 2</strong> promised his client:</p>
<ul>
<li>Full website optimisation</li>
<li>In 6 languages</li>
<li>Keyword research</li>
<li>Ongoing reporting</li>
</ul>
<p>For just £295 up front and then £50 a month.</p>
<p>As the £50 was due to come out of his bank acount, the client asked what had been done so far. He was presented with a 3 page word document telling him what to change the title and META tags on 3 pages of his site to read. As he said to me:</p>
<blockquote><p>It can&#8217;t have taken them more than 30 minutes to produce, and I could have done it myself!</p></blockquote>
<p>So, far from the &#8216;full website optimisation&#8217; of his 100+ pages, he got given (bad) advice on how to change 3 of his pages. No content advice. No Webmaster Tools account. No offsite optimisation advice. No page structure advice. Nothing. Just 3 badly formatted pages of a Word document that to be honest my 9 year old stepdaughter couldprobably have written better, and her first language is French!</p>
<p>No mention of the 6 languages optimisation he was promised (which is impossible anyway as the site was only in English), or keyword research.</p>
<p>When he queried this, he was told that he can&#8217;t have been promised what he was, and all calls are recorded. He asked to hear his recording and this was rapidly altered to &#8217;some calls are recorded&#8217;.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m going to put the &#8216;you get what you pay for&#8217; argument to one side &#8211; the guy involved feels a bit stupid, but he was promised a lot, and most of it was blatant lies.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder that this industry has such a bad rep?</p>
<p>I will hold my hands up and say i&#8217;m not perfect. I&#8217;m not the best SEO in the world (there&#8217;s always something to learn from someone). And do you know what, I&#8217;m scatty as hell! But because of that I&#8217;ve put systems in place that mean that every site we optimise goes through a number of checks, and a whole process from start to finish. Once a site is &#8216;finished&#8217; it goes into another process line that makes sure that ongoing recommendations and reports are sent. I like to think we keep in touch with our clients, and that goes some way towards the many people who come to us because they&#8217;re been recommended to by current clients.</p>
<p>Everyone makes mistakes sometimes. Everyone forgets, misplaces something, or has software / hardware issues that mean things don&#8217;t go quite to plan. But to blatantly lie to your clients, tell them things that are clearly untrue and provide them with substandard work? That&#8217;s scumbaggery of the highest standard.</p>
<p>When I speak with people like the two companies being ripped off above (and no, I didn&#8217;t pitch them for work) I feel ashamed to be in the industry I&#8217;m in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/16/google-no-longer-uses-title-tags-and-other-blatant-untruths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My link exchange policy</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/09/my-link-exchange-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/09/my-link-exchange-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or, an open letter to people spamming me with requests to exchange links&#8230;
Yet again I receive a template email from someone who clearly uses an automated program to send them out, asking me to put their link on my site in return for having my link on their site (still with me?).
The email itself raises [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, an open letter to people spamming me with requests to exchange links&#8230;</p>
<p>Yet again I receive a template email from someone who clearly uses an automated program to send them out, asking me to put their link on my site in return for having my link on their site (still with me?).</p>
<p>The email itself raises a few points, which I&#8217;d like to go in to, and then establish this post as my official link exchange policy.</p>
<blockquote><p>My name is Oxxxxx Pxxxx. I&#8217;ve just visited your website <a href="http://nikkipilkington.com/" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">nikkipilkington.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Erm, I don&#8217;t believe you.</p>
<blockquote><p>I was wondering if you&#8217;d be interested in exchanging links with my website. I can offer you a HOME PAGE link back<br />
from my Web marketing and SEO guide website which is xxxxxxxx.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this exchange would be benefitial for both of our sites,<br />
helping towards increasing our visibility in search engines.</p>
<p>If you are interested, please add the following information to your<br />
website and kindly let me know when it&#8217;s ready. I&#8217;ll do the same for<br />
you in less than 24 hours, otherwise you can delete my link from your<br />
site.</p>
<p>Title: SEO &amp; Internet Marketing<br />
URL:  removed<br />
Description:  SEO &amp; Internet Marketing for small business websites</p></blockquote>
<p>If you had indeed looked at my website, you would have noticed a couple of things:</p>
<ol>
<li>I don&#8217;t have links to any other sites on there, unless they are contextual and part of something I am writing</li>
<li>My site promotes my company&#8217;s SEO &amp; Internet Marketing Services</li>
</ol>
<p>Now, I freely admit that I&#8217;m not among the world&#8217;s most intelligent people, but I like to think I have a pretty sane head on my shoulders, so WHY ON EARTH do you think I would like to offer a link on my well promoted site to someone who purports to be one of my competitors? And if I, in some moment of deranged madness, agreed to do this, what makes you think that all I would want in return is a link on a page on your site which contains many of my other competitors, and isn&#8217;t even in your main navigation?</p>
<p>You finish your email with:</p>
<blockquote><p>PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT A SPAM OR AUTOMATED EMAIL, IT&#8217;S ONLY A REQUEST FOR A <span>LINK</span> <span>EXCHANGE</span>. YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS NOT BEEN ADDED TO ANY LISTS, AND YOU WILL NOT BE CONTACTED AGAIN. IF YOU&#8217;D LIKE TO MAKE SURE WE DON&#8217;T CONTACT YOU AGAIN, PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING FORM: (web address removed) OR WRITE AN EMAIL TO (email address removed)</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, Ms P., I beg to differ. It&#8217;s unsolicited and it&#8217;s commercial &#8211; and I suspect sent out in bulk with an automated program -  that makes it spam. And that&#8217;s before we get to your outrageous &#8216;you will not be contacted again&#8217; rubbish &#8211; this is the 3rd such email from you in 2 days, albeit promoting different sites (I don&#8217;t want to link to an Indian web hosting company or a watchmaker site either, thanks awfully).</p>
<p>And if I &#8216;will not be contacted again&#8217;, why do I then have to visit some site to fill in a form to &#8216;be sure&#8217; you don&#8217;t contact me again? The same form, by the way, that I have filled in 3 times already.</p>
<blockquote><p>PLEASE ACCEPT OUR APOLOGIES FOR CONTACTING YOU.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, no, please accept MY apologies for:</p>
<ol>
<li>Thinking you clearly have no idea how to do your job</li>
<li>Writing a blog post about how bloody useless you are, and</li>
<li>Pointing out your faults to the lovely people that read my blog</li>
</ol>
<p>The above is a moronic and useless way to ask for link exchange. The full email also claimed that having my link on their site would &#8216;benefit me in the search engines&#8217; &#8211; having looked at their spammy site I can assure you it wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So, what is my linking policy? Simple &#8211; I don&#8217;t exchange links. With ANYONE. If a link is on my site it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s part of a post I&#8217;m writing, or it&#8217;s relevant to the page it&#8217;s on. I dont want to exchange links with holiday sites, hosting sites, watch sites, viagra sites, porn sites &#8211; I don&#8217;t want to exchange links with any sites at all.</p>
<p>Why? Because exchanging links with unrelated sites does nothing to help your Google listings, despite what people will tell you. Links from sites that are relevant and related to yours <em>may </em>help &#8211; but why would I want to advertise my competitors on my own website for the sake of a non-guaranteed &#8216;boost&#8217; in Google? Even if I didn&#8217;t have the listings I wanted (I do) then that would be madness.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll continue link building in the way I always have &#8211; slowly and surely, getting one way links from well thought of sites, and not seeing it as the be all and end all of SEO. Because it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave the closing comment to Oxxxxx Pxxxx:</p>
<blockquote><p>I hope you have a nice day and thank you for your time.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/09/my-link-exchange-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does PageRank matter? Here we go again&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/08/does-pagerank-matter-here-we-go-again/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/08/does-pagerank-matter-here-we-go-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s happened in 2 forums I&#8217;m a part of, and I&#8217;ve seen a few people Tweeting about it &#8211; the dreaded PageRank argument has raised it&#8217;s head again.
Before we talk about whether it matters, for those of you not so sure, here&#8217;s the Wikipedia definition of PageRank:
PageRank is a link analysis algorithm, named after Larry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s happened in 2 forums I&#8217;m a part of, and I&#8217;ve seen a few people Tweeting about it &#8211; the dreaded PageRank argument has raised it&#8217;s head again.</p>
<p>Before we talk about whether it matters, for those of you not so sure, here&#8217;s the Wikipedia definition of PageRank:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>PageRank</strong> is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_theory#link_analysis" rel="nofollow" title="Network theory" >link analysis</a> algorithm, named after <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Page" rel="nofollow" title="Larry Page" >Larry Page</a>, used by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google" rel="nofollow" title="Google" >Google</a> Internet <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine" rel="nofollow" title="Search engine" >search engine</a> that assigns a numerical weighting to each element of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlink" rel="nofollow" title="Hyperlink" >hyperlinked</a> set of documents, such as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web" rel="nofollow" title="World Wide Web" >World Wide Web</a>, with the purpose of &#8220;measuring&#8221; its relative importance within the set. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm" rel="nofollow" title="Algorithm" >algorithm</a> may be applied to any collection of entities with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal" rel="nofollow" title="Reciprocal" >reciprocal</a> quotations and references. The numerical weight that it assigns to any given element <em>E</em> is also called the <em>PageRank of E</em> and denoted by <span><em>P</em><em>R</em>(<em>E</em>).</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span>Put in a simple way, PageRank is a number assigned to your web page by Google &#8211; it goes from 0-10 (officially), and in the past it had some weighting towards your search engine positions.</span></p>
<p><span>Opinions differ on whether or not it matters &#8211; I&#8217;m of the opinion that it&#8217;s not worth obsessing over. To my mind, i you have a PR of 8, but your website languishes on page 55 for the phrases you want to be found for, life isn&#8217;t good. If you have a PageRank of 3, yet you&#8217;re on the front page of Google for the phrases that matter, then all is well with the world <img src='http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </span></p>
<p><span>I was challenged on my &#8220;Oh dear, not the PR debate again&#8221; stance with the comment &#8220;But PageRank matters when I&#8217;m buying or selling links. Links in from higher PageRanked sites matter more&#8221;. And the chap in question kind of has a point &#8211; if you have links from higher PR sites, then it can help your search engine listings, and is a GOOD THING. That said, to my mind it&#8217;s still not worth obsessing over.</span></p>
<p><span>Worry about your positions in the search engine results (SERPS), not some random number on a Google Toolbar.</span></p>
<p><span>As an aside to this, and just in case you were all rushing off to buy links from PR9 sites &#8211; here&#8217;s Google&#8217;s official stance on buying links that pass PageRank in order to help search engine positions:<br />
</span></p>
<blockquote><p>Buying or selling links that pass PageRank is in violation of Google&#8217;s webmaster guidelines and can negatively impact a site&#8217;s ranking in search results.</p>
<p>(From <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736</a></p></blockquote>
<p>If you read the rest of that page, high PR sites CAN sell links, but are forced to use the &#8216;nofollow&#8217; tag, which stops any &#8216;Google juice&#8217; being given and so makes them practically useless when used in that way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again &#8211; rather than worrying about PageRank when approaching sites for links, worry about whether or not they get the types of visitors that would be interested in your site.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span><br />
</span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2009/07/08/does-pagerank-matter-here-we-go-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GetClicky &#8211; a God among webstats providers</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/21/getclicky-a-god-among-webstats-providers/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/21/getclicky-a-god-among-webstats-providers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freebies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titles & Tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/21/getclicky-a-god-among-webstats-providers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



For a long time I used Google Analytics to provide webstats for me and for my clients &#8211; and it worked. Great stats, pretty graphs, nice figures &#8211; everything I needed.The problem I had was that I couldn&#8217;t get real time stats &#8211; I had to wait until the next day, by which time in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if !mso]><br />
<mce:style><!   v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  --></p>
<p><!--[endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal   0         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--    --></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 10]><br />
<mce:style><!    /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}  --></p>
<p><!--[endif]--><img src="http://getclicky.com/" alt="" align="left" /><img src="http://static.getclicky.com/media/logo.png" alt="" width="145" height="70" align="left" />For a long time I used Google Analytics to provide webstats for me and for my clients &#8211; and it worked. Great stats, pretty graphs, nice figures &#8211; everything I needed.The problem I had was that I couldn&#8217;t get real time stats &#8211; I had to wait until the next day, by which time in some cases it was too late to react to surges in traffic.</p>
<p>I needed something that showed me what my visitors were doing and where they were coming from NOW, not yesterday!</p>
<p>And then I found <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">GetClicky</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://static.getclicky.com/media/screenshots/dashboard_small.gif" alt="" width="350" height="200" align="left" /> <img src="http://static.getclicky.com/media/screenshots/visitor_small.gif" alt="" width="350" height="200" /></p>
<p>As they say about themselves:</p>
<p><em><a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">Clicky </a>is a web analyzer that works great with any web site, even Ajax and Flash sites. It was originally targeted towards smaller web sites and blogs because it tracks a high level of detail on every visitor, and these types of sites find this information very interesting.<br />
</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the high level of detail, combined with the fact that I can see what visitors are doing RIGHT NOW that makes <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">GetClicky </a>the perfect stats tool for me.</p>
<p>So what do you get?</p>
<p><strong>The Dashboard: </strong></p>
<p>The dashboard is an overview of the traffic to your site &#8211; telling you how mny visitors you&#8217;ve had (and showing you trends in a nifty little graph), how many actions those vistors have taken (eg where have they gone in your site), where your visitors have come from, what search phrases they have used and which pages they have visited.As an overview of your traffic, it&#8217;s very useful, but it&#8217;s in the nitty gritty that <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">getClicky </a>excels, and that&#8217;s what&#8217;s more exciting to me.</p>
<p><strong>Visitors<br />
</strong></p>
<p>The Visitors tab gives you a list of all your recent visitors, and tells you where they came to your site from.You&#8217;ll know what time they visited, what their IP address is, how many actions they took on your site, and if the referrer was a search engine, what search phrases they used.</p>
<p>This can be filtered in a number of ways and is very useful information.</p>
<p><strong>Actions<br />
</strong></p>
<p>I love the Actions tab as it shows me what each and every visitor has doen on my sites. I can see that one visitor has come to the site from an article that was Stumbled on Stumbleupon, and has not only read that article, but has clicked on the links in it to go to external sites, returned to my site and read some more articles, and even whether they have clicked on an email link to email me. By the time I receive the email I probably already know who they are and what they&#8217;ve been looking at and can tailor my reply accordingly &#8211; how cool is THAT?</p>
<p><strong>Content<br />
</strong></p>
<p>The content tab shows me which pages of my site are being visited, which are the entrance pages, exit pages, which of my files are being downloaded (in my main site, <a href="http://www.nikkipilkington.com/" rel="nofollow" >www.nikkipilkington.com</a>, I have PDF versions of my internet marketing articles &#8211; this view tells me how many downloads they get every day) and more.</p>
<p><strong>Links<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Like most other traffic stats, this tells me where my visitors are coming from. But unlike most other traffic stats, it also shows me which links a visitor is clicking on to LEAVE my site.</p>
<p>This is great &#8211; I know whether links in my articles are being visited, recommendations are being followed, links to other sites I own are being clicked &#8211; even down to whether someoneclicks on an email link. I can also track visitors that leave to read something I have recommended and then come back! This to me is vital information and one of my favourite <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">GetClicky </a>features.</p>
<p><strong>Searches</strong></p>
<p>The searches tab shows me the latest search phrases I am being fond for on search engines &#8211; it&#8217;s always interesting to see the searches that bring people to my various sites &#8211; intended and unintentional <img src='http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Spy</strong><img src="file:///C:/Users/Nikkers/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>This is my favourite <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">GetClicky </a>tab of all.</p>
<p>I can see, in REAL TIME, visitors on my site. I can see which pages they are clicking on, which files they are downloading, external links they are following, and more.</p>
<p>It allows me to react to visitors almost instantly &#8211; if I can see that lots of people are on Using Twitter for Business part one on my Business on twitter site, I can quickly amend the page to add a link to other more recent articles I may have written, in order to drive traffic there. If I see that lots of people are clicking on an external link to someone else&#8217;s blog, I can make sure I let the blog writer know, and investigate any synergy we may have to exploit the large amounts of traffic.</p>
<p>The spy tab has a multitude of uses &#8211; but I warn you, it&#8217;s very addictive <img src='http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All in all I think <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">GetClicky </a>is as close to perfect as a real time web stats tool can get.</p>
<p><strong>Pricing?<br />
</strong></p>
<p>There is a free service, which doesn&#8217;t include the Spy tab, and if you sign up now you&#8217;ll get a free 21 day trial of the Premium service, which is what I use. It&#8217;s only $60 for the year and you can pay monthly &#8211; it&#8217;s well worth the investment to have your traffic stats NOW instead of tomorrow.</p>
<p>So, why not given it a go? <a href="http://getclicky.com/36667" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">Sign up now at Get Clicky</a> and let me know how you get on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/21/getclicky-a-god-among-webstats-providers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip #90 &#8211; Variety is the spice of life</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don’t get everyone to link to you with the same anchor text, and don’t use the same anchor text in all of your links.
Vary the text to give you more of a chance with different search phrases.
This also ensures that Google doesn’t see the exact same anchor text for you everywhere and mistakenly presume you’ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t get everyone to link to you with the same anchor text, and don’t use the same anchor text in all of your links.</p>
<p>Vary the text to give you more of a chance with different search phrases.</p>
<p>This also ensures that Google doesn’t see the exact same anchor text for you everywhere and mistakenly presume you’ve been on some automated spree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip #90 &#8211; Variety is the spice of life</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life-2/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don’t get everyone to link to you with the same anchor text, and don’t use the same anchor text in all of your links.
Vary the text to give you more of a chance with different search phrases.
This also ensures that Google doesn’t see the exact same anchor text for you everywhere and mistakenly presume you’ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t get everyone to link to you with the same anchor text, and don’t use the same anchor text in all of your links.</p>
<p>Vary the text to give you more of a chance with different search phrases.</p>
<p>This also ensures that Google doesn’t see the exact same anchor text for you everywhere and mistakenly presume you’ve been on some automated spree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/17/tip-90-variety-is-the-spice-of-life-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip #117 &#8211; Comment cava?</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/11/tip-117-comment-cava/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/11/tip-117-comment-cava/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Key Phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/11/tip-117-comment-cava/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment tags can be a good and bad thing, but the one thing they should never be used for is hiding keywords.
A comment tag usually looks something like this in the code of your website:
&#60;!&#8211; Words in here &#8211;&#62;
It can be used legitimately to mark the beginning and end of bits of code, to explain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment tags can be a good and bad thing, but the one thing they should never be used for is hiding keywords.</p>
<p>A comment tag usually looks something like this in the code of your website:</p>
<p>&lt;!&#8211; Words in here &#8211;&gt;</p>
<p>It can be used legitimately to mark the beginning and end of bits of code, to explain why a developer did what they did and to help someone new pick up some code designed by someone else.</p>
<p>However, a few years ago webmasters started using it more and more for stuffing keywords.</p>
<p>The comment tag is not seen on the finished web page (it’s only in the code) so it was seen as an ideal way to get more examples of keyphrases into the site without spoiling the aesthetics.</p>
<p>The search engines read the code, saw the keyphrase and listed the site well.</p>
<p>However, as with all the other tricks in the No no no section, the search engines caught on and now it’s seen as spam.</p>
<p>So, if you want to be safe, only use the comment tags for the purpose in which they were meant to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/07/11/tip-117-comment-cava/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip #125 &#8211; Farmer’s market</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/tip-125-farmer%e2%80%99s-market/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/tip-125-farmer%e2%80%99s-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/tip-125-farmer%e2%80%99s-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that links into a site is a good thing. We should know by now that one way links are better than reciprocal ones.
It’s tempting to set up a number of sites, all related to the same topic, and link them to each other in order to gain more ‘link popularity’.
And it used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that links into a site is a good thing. We should know by now that one way links are better than reciprocal ones.</p>
<p>It’s tempting to set up a number of sites, all related to the same topic, and link them to each other in order to gain more ‘link popularity’.<br />
And it used to work.</p>
<p>It doesn’t now – don’t do it. Get good quality links from good quality sites (preferably not on the same server as you) and use anchor text wherever possible.</p>
<p>http://www.nikkipilkington.com<br />
http://www.299steps.com</p>
<p>No link farms……. Google doesn’t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/05/14/tip-125-farmer%e2%80%99s-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip #245 &#8211; No Guarantees</title>
		<link>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/03/18/245-no-guarantees/</link>
		<comments>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/03/18/245-no-guarantees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No no no!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/03/18/245-no-guarantees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google themselves say to be wary of SEO companies that guarantee to get you to number one on Google:
Beware of SEOs that claim to guarantee rankings, allege a &#8220;special relationship&#8221; with Google, or advertise a &#8220;priority submit&#8221; to Google.
There is no priority submit for Google.
In fact, the only way to submit a site to Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google themselves say to be wary of SEO companies that guarantee to get you to number one on Google:</p>
<p>Beware of SEOs that claim to guarantee rankings, allege a &#8220;special relationship&#8221; with Google, or advertise a &#8220;priority submit&#8221; to Google.</p>
<p>There is no priority submit for Google.</p>
<p>In fact, the only way to submit a site to Google directly is through our Add URL page or through the Google Sitemaps program, and you can do this yourself at no cost whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nikkipilk.sc10.co.uk/blog/2008/03/18/245-no-guarantees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
